The Reason to be Faithful
Study Scripture: HEBREWS 1:1-9, 2:1-4
BACKGROUND SCRIPTURE: HEBREWS 1:1- 2:4

Lesson
1

 We pray that by studying this lesson you will be edified and immensely blessed.  Email your questions or comments concerning this study to questions@7thdaybaptistchurch.org  If you wish to use or reproduce content from this web site please see guides lines for use.

Key Verse

The Son is the radiance of God's glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven.

Hebrews 1:3

INTRODUCTION

The Book of Hebrews is unique in that it alone deals fully and at great length with the greatness of Jesus, which flows into his present position as man’s great High Priest. The One whom they can call confidently for help, when the daily pressures and trials of life confront them.  The book deals fully with the priesthood of Jesus, comparing and contrasting the Melchizedek priesthood with the Levitical priesthood. 

Ephesians details several critical things about Jesus and his position but Hebrews deals with this matter at greater length than anywhere else. Ephesians 1: 20-22 informs us; that God the Father had …“ set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places

Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come:

And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church” 

The book of Hebrews developed this theme at great length, and along with the book of Revelation, gives us a complete and masterful presentation of the exaltation of Christ, showing that Jesus alone occupies the place of ultimate authority in the entire universe. 

Everything about Jesus declare that he has this ultimate authority by right, as well as because of his conquests. 

It also points to the most precious promise that the city of God, made by God, would come to earth, and that all the men who sought for this city and risked their lives seeking for this city would rule with Jesus on the earth. 

One writer discusses the importance of this book and asks believers some pointed questions. He says:

“ Without this epistle in our Bibles today, the people of God would be greatly impoverished. Modern readers may lack the Jewish background, which the original recipients possessed, yet the letter forces all Christians of any age to face certain issues.

Do we believe that Jesus is God the Son, infinitely higher than any angel, who is both the creator of all things and the final arbiter of all human events?

Are you trusting in his death on the Cross and his subsequent bodily resurrection as the full and complete ground of our salvation, or are we still looking to some act by us or some ritual or sacrament performed for us to bring us safely to heaven?

Do you habitually turn to Jesus as our great high priest, to find inner strengthening to face pressures, resist temptation, conquer guilt, or achieve self-control in daily situations?

Are you permitting our cultural context to lure us into practices or deeds that are inconsistent with the new life we have been given in Christ?

Do we count it a privilege to take up our cross daily and glory in bearing his reproach in the midst of a confused and immoral world?

Is the expectation of the return of Jesus as King over the whole Earth a bright and shining reality to us, frequently renewing our vision and outlook?

Do we recognize the loving hand of God upon us in the midst of hardships, disappointments and trials, as strengthening us and also giving us opportunity to display his character to those who are near us?

These are the concerns of the writer of Hebrews.  These are the “things that accompany salvation” to which he refers in Hebrews 6:9. They must all become our daily concern as we are to lay full hold of the “better things” which Jesus’ birth in Bethlehem Manger introduced.” 

It is strongly felt by most commentators that this book has the greatest relevance to believers today, as they like the first recipients of the letter, struggle to maintain their faith amidst all the chaos and ungodly cultural pressures that are steadily increasing, and succeeding in pulling many away from Scripture truths. 

Who wrote this Book?

There has for a long time been controversy over who wrote the book.  It is clear that the book was not an anonymous one, for those who originally got the book clearly knew the writer, even though he did not state his name.  The book however was used quite often and writers from the end of the first century quoted from it.  

Clement of Rome, who lived at the end of the first century used it though he did not apparently put it on par with the Old Testament Scriptures. He did not identify who wrote it, but within the first century he used it extensively in writing to the Corinthian church. Some believe that it was originally written to Jewish believers in Rome, and he and other believers there for easy access to the original.  Clement of Alexandria, in the middle of the second century, felt that Paul wrote it in Hebrew and Luke translated it into Greek. He based his position on the authority of the chief of the School for Christian leaders in Alexandria.  

The Eastern churches readily accepted this book is of Pauline authorship. The western churches were somewhat slower to accept it, but by the fourth century it was generally accepted. 

  Another Tertullian, lived in the early third century felt that it was written by Barnabas, but he did not offer any proof other than saying that because the book spoke much about the levitical priesthood, and that since Barnabas was a Levite and an encourager he was the likely writer. 

Luther felt that Apollos wrote it, because he was an eloquent speaker, was quite educated, and had a good command of Old Testament Scriptures. One modern theologian has speculated that Priscilla (with Aquila) wrote it, and the church did not credit her with it since she was a woman. But of course the masculine gender used of the writer in chapter 11:32 argues against that theory. 

Many of the people in the early church thought that Paul was the writer, and by the end of the third century, and especially from the fourth, Paul’s name was attached by almost all to this book.  The fifth council of Carthage in AD 419 formally placed it among Paul’s other Epistles. 

Some still think Paul’s authorship is unlikely for the reasons that this writer lists :

“The writer cites differently from St. Paul; he writes differently; he argues differently; he declaims differently: he constructs and connects his sentences differently; he builds up his paragraphs on a wholly different model…His style is the style of a man who think as well as writes in Greek; whereas St. Paul wrote in Greek but thought in Syriac.” 

But others think that Paul given his Hebrew-Hellenistic education at Jerusalem and Tarsus, would enable him to write in the eloquent and rhetorical style of this book, using the quotations from the Old Testament Greek Septuagint translation, writing in Greek and laying aside is normally unadorned style.  It is felt that the internal evidence, the topics handled and the interpretations given were so close to the Pauline views, that it must have been written by Paul or translated by his scribe under his direction. It bears an extremely close link with Paul’s letter to the Colossians.  

The book was obviously written to reach Jewish Christian, who were well acquainted with Old Testament Scripture, but the material is dealt with in a way which suggest that it was written to people with a Greek frame of mind.  The location of these people was not disclosed, and there is some controversy about that matter. 

There is some evidence that the book was written at a quite early date. It refers to Timothy in 13:23. Though it deals with the Levitical priesthood at length it does not refer at all to the destruction of the Temple and that system. The temple was obviously still standing and sacrificial and other rituals were still continuing.  It doesn’t even speak much about physical persecution.  All these seem to indicate an early date of writing, before the end of the sixties. 

This book however is very different for it has eighty two Old Testament references, twenty nine of which are direct quotations, with fifty three being allusions.  Interestingly, there is no quotation from the Apocrypha. 

It is to these people therefore, these early Jewish Christians, steeped in Old Testament teachings, strong believers that Jesus of Nazareth was the long awaited Jewish Messiah that Hebrews first spoke. 

Some people still have difficulties with Hebrews because of its many Old Testament references and its firm grounding of Christianity in the faith of Judaism, as well as its strong insistence on faultless behavior.  

It has been very difficult for those who have difficulty in understanding that Christianity is a Jewish faith, and that Jesus and the Apostles are Jews too, who properly appropriate Hebrews to themselves, to separate liberty from license, and to easily accept the book’s insistence on divine authority, and the necessity to adhere to and persevere in the Christian life of holiness. 

The Book of Hebrews has a most important theme for all believers of all ages. It exhorts us to recognize that Jesus is completely superior to all things, and that behooves us to continue strong in holding to him.

 

THE TEXT

Verse 1.   It is most interesting to note that this book begins dramatically and immediately launches into Old Testament prophetic writings, which the writer states have now been fulfilled in Jesus. There are no greetings, disclosure of the writer’s name, and no initial benedictions. 

It focuses on dealing with the solutions to the ancient and frequent stumbling around that humans did and do to find God, and how men have strenuously sought to hear what God was saying to them.  

The emphasis was immediately placed on the fact that God existed, that he is there, and that God has spoken to us.  In other words, God has not left man alone, but has revealed himself to man. He knew our incapabilities and he sought us out. 

God did not reveal everything about himself in one fell swoop, but at different times and in different ways gave each one of his prophets or messengers additional information and points of emphasis as were required.  Sometimes the prophets or messengers spoke through parables, sometimes they use psalms, sometimes proverbs, sometimes dramatic presentations, sometimes direct, frank, in your face prophetic confrontations, and sometimes they wrote down historical events, so that the people of God could learn many lessons. 

It must be made clear that God taught the intellectually superior Adam and Eve tremendous things about themselves.  It is hardly likely, since they talked with God face to face in the Garden of Eden, that our knowledge about God is superior in many ways to theirs. But we also know that tremendous degeneration occurred, and God had to teach Adam’s descendants all over again in many ways and at different times.    

Of course not all of these men after Adam were ignorant of God. Men such as Enoch stand out, and their lives and devotion to God put us to shame. 

The messengers of God, God’s ancient spokesmen, therefore spoke to our Jewish fathers or predecessors in various ways. They did this after God spoke to them in various ways, such as how he spoke to Moses in the burning Bush, to Elijah in a still small voice, to Isaiah in heavenly visions, to Amos in a basket of fruit, and so on.  The accumulation of these revelations continued steadily, and as the Apostle Paul stated, all of these things happened to Israel to teach us some critical truths.    

All these revelations ceased for four hundred years after the last Old Testament prophet Malachi. 

 It is important to note several things about these prophets of God.  They were chosen by God, qualified by God specifically for the office of revealing the will of God to men. They were always one hundred percent accurate, never making a mistake in their pronouncements, and never at any time contradicting previous revelations of God.   

The test of a true prophet of God was quite strict.  We do not need an exhaustive look at those today that claim to be prophets to realize that they definitely do not conform to the requirements of a prophet of God. They simply want the aura, respectability, authority, and power that they think goes with being a prophet of God, but they simply do not fit.   

The ancient prophets where the guardians of God’s truths, and they zealously guarded the purity of the people of God.  Our modern claimants just are not that way.                                      

 

Verse 2.   Great were the work of these prophets, and they were highly regarded by God. 

Hebrews proclaims, God has made his final and complete statement of revelation in Jesus. This revelation is superior to those of the prophets. 

 Why? because Jesus himself is the message from the Father. He has brought himself, the message from God the Father. Everything about him reveals God. 

This message of God has come in the last days. The Jewish Rabbins (plural of Rabbi) divided the entire time into “this age”, or “world”, and “the age to come”. Neither they nor Jesus knew about any transition period. 

Jesus was superior to the prophets and had primacy for several reasons.   

First, God has spoken by or in his Son.  This person, because he is in the relationship of a son, has complete authority as a spokesman. 

Note that in this book it is the Father who was speaking, and he speaks about the Son, about whom he is and what he is coming for. 

Notice that three things show up the uniqueness of the Son initially. The contrast in revelation stands out because previously God had spoken in various ways or methods, (the first point of contrast), at various times (the second point of contrast), and now in only one Son, (a contrast of agency). The relative inferiority of the previous revelation as contrasted or compared to that of the Son stands out, for as one writer points out:

“What is communicated in parts, sections, fragments, must of necessity be imperfect: and so also a representation which is made in many modes cannot be other than provisional”. 

God’s word through his Son is therefore complete.  The Apostles are there only to communicate his words, not to add any new teachings or insights. For this they were especially blessed as Jesus indicated in Matthew 13:16-17. 

Let us understand one thing though and it is namely that the Old Testament is the Word of God. From Genesis on down it is the word of God. 

But it is clear that the voice of the Son spells out in detail the Word of God, and his word clarifies, includes, and surpasses all the previous revelations. It is equally true that one has to read and understand the revelations before Jesus, in order to understand properly what he is talking about.  One cannot easily understand the teachings of Jesus and the Apostles without understanding their context.  History has shown us that when men try to do that, namely, interpret Jesus and his teachings without any context, they invariably makes serious mistakes, and generally end up being against the law and commandments of God, and being anti-Semitic to varying degrees.

 

One writer comments:

“Though Jesus is clearly superior to the prophets, he does not replace their revelation.  The Old Testament remains as valid Scripture for the followers of Jesus, as the author will bring out many times. God used the prophets as spokesmen, but the Son, by contrast, “stands “ (appointed) as heir of all things. Those all things refer to the material universe and all forces within it, seated by the Son in partnership with the Father and the Spirit.”             

The Son is glorious and this is indicated by seven descriptions.   

His Son is “heir to all things”, for being a son is logically an heir, and is in a position of power and ability to make the universe. 

Because he is The Son, he stands appointed to the office of heir off all creation, all things in the material universe and everything in it, so that he has everything by right of inheritance.   

This is of course quite appropriate, for because of the eternal councils of God he is the one who made the worlds. He made and he inherits. 

Note that the prophets knew and taught that the Messiah would be the one in whom all things would climax.               

 

Verse 3.   Next we are told that the Son is the radiance of God glory. 

‘Brightness’ is ‘apaugasma’ which “denotes the radiance shining forth from the source of light” and so Jesus is the outpouring of the inherent brightness of God.  This is Light from Light, or “effulgence”. 

When Jesus was transfigured his glory or radiance was seen.  When John saw him and described him in Revelation, there was this radiance of God. 

To even more strongly affirm the nature of the Son, he is now described as the express image of God’s person, thus as in Colossians 1:15 and Philippians 2:6, the Son fully shares in the divine nature. This unmistakably asserts his deity. 

“Person” in Greek means “of His substantial essence” or “hypostasis”. When Jesus was on earth this “express image” was veiled in the flesh.     

It is therefore translated that Jesus is the exact representation of his (God’s) being.  The word used conveys the idea of an exact likeness, as made by a stamp or die, so as the coin is the exact image of the die, so the Son reproduces the precise character (Greek charakter—used only here) of the Father. Jesus therefore could tell Philip that anyone that had seen him had seen the Father.

(John 14:9). 

We are next told that the Son has his work as the master of the universe, for he sustains all things by his powerful word.  

Jesus therefore not only is the creator or originator of the universe, but he is also its sustainer, and finally is its destination. Jesus still sustained the universe by his inherent power when he was on earth.

One writer points out that the word;  ‘Upholding’ is better thought of as ‘maintaining’; the word does not have the idea of passively holding something up (like the mythical Atlas held the earth) but of actively sustaining.

In his earthly ministry, Jesus constantly demonstrated the power of his word-He would heal, forgive, cast out demons, calm nature’s fury all with the expression of one word”. 

This of course shows that the Son of God is a person, for he has a word. He has power in his word, and he has utterance and expresses his word and power.   

The further work of Jesus as the one who made purification of sins, in other words, His atonement, shows his gracious covering of our guilt and uncleanness, by his tremendous agony and shedding of his blood on the Cross. 

His sufferings were honorable and provided full satisfaction for the sins of his people. His suffering and death was of infinite meritorious value, and was sufficient to satisfy. 

Note that this brought to mind what had been happening for years on earth and finally was centralized in the Temple.

One writer states:

“The mediation between man and God, who was present in the Most Holy Place, was   revealed in three forms: (1) in sacrifices (typical propitiations for guilt); (2) in the priesthood (the agents of those sacrifices); (3) in the Levitical laws of purity (levitical purity being attained by sacrifice positively, by avoidance of levitical pollution negatively, the people being thus enabled to come into the presence of God without dying, (Deut 5:26; Leviticus 16:1-34).”      

Jesus’ sufferings had such value, that from this great humiliation, he was exalted and sat down at God’s right hand.  This act was an act of the Father, for Hebrews 8:1 and Ephesians 1:20 tells us that this was something done by the Father, it was the Father’s action that exalted him, as the Son of man after his suffering, because he was now to be Mediator for man in the presence of God.    

Jesus is therefore now Redeemer, and Mediator, given the highest of honors, activity, and authority.  Everything is done through him.  He has finished all the battles, and all opposition is really already conquered. There is no doubt now what the end of history will be, we only have to wait and be faithful to enjoy all the promised blessings of the new heaven and new earth.   

The Jesus the Hebrews worship and who we worship, who has saved us, has this excellency, honor, power, and authority.  See Psalm 110 for this lesson.  

 

Verse 4.   We should now note that in this world there are many rivals for the attention of men, and that men are constantly being drawn away from the only true source of power and salvation. 

Hebrews now begins a series of arguments to show that Christ is superior to every single rival, whoever they might be.  This of course would ensure that the Christian readers would not be drawn away by foolish alternatives. 

Attention is therefore drawn to the angels, and the fact that even though they were glorious beings, and excellent, Jesus was superior in name and nature. 

This was an important matter, for Jews and Gentiles in the first century were thoroughly acquainted with the theology of angels.  

Jews believed that the Law was mediated from God through angels, and they knew that these invisible beings were powerful, there being some that served God and others that had rebelled against God.  

There was a dangerous tendency among some Jews to worship angels as was often demonstrated in the Old Testament when people came in contact with angels.  Even John the apostle had to be corrected on this matter by an angel. See Revelation 19:10 and 22:8-9. Of course, the Gentiles had no inhibitions about worshiping these other beings.   

We remember that Paul had to write to the Colossians in 2:16-18, condemning those who delighted in a false humility and worship of angels.  This was therefore a serious problem with both Jew and Gentile, for to Jews when angels spoke they listened, and with Gentiles when demons spoke they listened and worshipped. 

When the Jewish Christians therefore had ideas that angels were to be exalted, this was intolerable. Angels were never to be placed in any position where they were honored above Christ or to be as highly regarded as he was. 

This is also a modern practice, for they are many in churches who worship angels, consult horoscopes, participate in “channeling”, experiment with Ouija boards to get guidance, consult mediums, and might even join with the New Age Movement adherents in calling on fallen angels or avatars, and spirit guides to awaken hidden powers in them. 

The pagans in those days were afflicted with this error, and the pagans in our days are similarly afflicted.  Even many who profess to be believers have been ensnared. The occult is certainly growing in influence, as demonstrated by the print media and the entertainment media.

The old things are new again. 

The Father had set Jesus at his right hand, the place of ultimate power, and it was clear that Jesus, who had been ‘made lower than the angels’ was now exalted to be better, marked out after his humiliation and appointed to a manifested position of absolute superiority. He had humbled himself, laid aside his power and position, had redeemed and had conquered, and now was exalted.        

He had worked, and had been invested with the highest honor, after God had bruised him.  He had never been a mere creature as the angels were, but had now obtained by inheritance, as promised by the Father, a more excellent designation than the angels. They could not do what he did, and not of his rivals can do what he did. 

Any idea therefore that Jesus himself was an angel, or was even Michael the archangel is a heretical concept, which degrades the glory and majesty of Jesus.

 

Verse 5.   One writer sums this up:

“It is true that angels are called “sons of God” in the book of Job (1:6; 2:1; 38:7) because, like Adam, they are direct creations from God’s hand.  This fact may seem to mark angels as equal with Jesus and therefore proper objects of worship.  But Jesus is God’s Son from all eternity- the uncreated Son. Furthermore, the quotation from Psalm 2 highlights Jesus’ status as the exalted Son of Man, as Paul declared at Pisidian Antioch (Acts 13:33) referring to his resurrection from the dead.  Thus he was both the eternal Son and the glorified human Son (Son of God and Son of Man).

The writer here especially claims they see the superiority of Jesus over the angels as the Son of Man. No angel could claim either eternity or resurrection as the basis of his sonship, but Jesus had both.  Though the angels collectively were called sons of God, no individual angel ever is given that title, or singled out as having a unique status before God.  So the writer demands rhetorically,

“ To which of the angels did God ever say, “You are my Son; today I have become your Father.”                         

Psalm 2, the coronation Psalm is therefore fully applied to Jesus, referring to the time when Jesus, after suffering and dying, is resurrected and is exalted.  Paul in Acts 13 certainly understood it that way. 

Hebrews also draws on 2 Samuel 7:14 for the words “I will be his father, and he will be my son” initially spoken to David about Solomon, but now indicating a final fulfillment of the promises to David of an eternal reign, when David’s House would be restored and exalted. 

Verse 6.   Both Deuteronomy 32:43 and Psalm 97:7 spoke of angels worshiping Christ the Son. When the Son was born in Bethlehem the angels were commanded to and did worship him. While he was on earth even the demonic angels fell down before him addressing him as the Son of God.    

When he was by resurrection ‘the first to begotten of the dead’ and ascended, he became manifestly the heir. 

Begotten speaks of the quality of substance and essential nature between the Father and the Son.  

Note also that firstborn is as much a concept as it also stated who was born first.  We know this because many who were not born first in the Bible, are like David in Psalm 89:27, given the title “firstborn”. In Jeremiah 31:9 Ephraim is also given that title when he was not born first. 

We also know that the ancient rabbis called Yahweh himself “Firstborn of the World”. Rabbi Bechai in Lighfoot)

One writer also adds:

“The rabbis used Firstborn as a messianic title: “God said, As I made Jacob a first-born (Exodus 4:22), so also will I make King Messiah a first-born (Psalm 89:28)”. 

Jesus then is clearly superior, for God designed the angels to worship him. Jesus has a superior name, and a superior relationship.

 

Verse 7.   The rhetorical questions continue, for Jesus’ name is Son, while the angels are servants. They are indeed powerful, likened to flames of fire. This is taken from Psalm 104:4. But they, like the natural lightning and wind, are messengers and servants of God, being able to be powerful and destructive. But they are always under God’s control and serve him.

 

Verse 8.   In comparison to the servants, the Son is very different.  We have here a quotation from Psalm 45:6-7, where one person calls another person God, the article used in the Greek to mark emphasis. Psalm 45 is a wedding song, believed by Rabbis to be messianic.  

Here everlasting duration and righteousness are joined together. 

God says this of Christ, and shows Jesus’ true nature and divinity.  

Note now additional sharp contrast between Jesus and the angels.   

One writer puts it this way:

“This King is addressed twice as God; possesses a throne, a scepter, and a kingdom; loves righteousness and hates wickedness, has a special anointing of joy; and continues as king forever and ever. No angel could claim these attributes. The cause of the king’s joy is traced to his love of righteousness and hatred of wickedness. Here by contrast, may be a hint of the moral defection of the host of angels who fell with Satan. Angels could and did sin, but the Son’s love of righteousness kept him safe through the most severe temptations. Even those unfallen angels who also, presumably, love righteousness do so on the basis of choice, while the Son’s love of righteousness is inherent in his very nature. For this reason (therefore) God has set him above his companions.”                                     

The scepter of righteousness means literally a “rod of rectitude” or “straightforwardness”.

“Iniquity” means “lawlessness”. 

After he had completed his work and was raised in triumph, demonstrating his love of righteousness, he was anointed, solemnly entering into his position and ministry.

As one writer states “He is now the true royal Head of the theocracy”. 

Several proofs are then presented in verses 10-14 to show the absolute superiority of the nature of the Son over that of angels. The rhetorical questions continue in verse 13 and in verse 14 as Isaiah 46:4, Malachi 3:6, Isaiah 51:6, Psalm 102:26, Psalm 110:1 are called on to buttress this overwhelmingly powerful argument, that the Son is magnificent and in control. 

The Old Testament Scriptures and the New Testament Scriptures are as one in this indispensable teaching about the nature and work of the Son.  

The Son has an unchangeable, forever destiny, and he will be the same forever and ever as ruler.    

 

CHAPTER 2

Logically therefore the warning follows.  Therefore is put on the table. 

There are five major warning passages in Hebrew aimed at preventing a specific kind of unbelief. 

Verse 1.   There is danger in slipping or drifting away, slowly moving in the wrong direction by not giving careful attention to the words of Jesus.  Obviously then mature believers, who have a long professed faith in Christ can drift, sleeping without probably recognizing this and the real serious state in which they are. When one drifts from the pre-eminent message of Christ it’s really a bad bad situation.

 

Therefore pay attention! 

Verse 2.   It has always been held that Moses had been given much of his instruction by angels during the time that he was on the Mount away from his people.  See Deuteronomy 33:2; Psalm 68:17; Acts 7:53; Galatians 3:19. This is not to say that Moses did not have an encounter with God himself, that is, with Jesus, but it does indicate that the angels of God were actively involved with him.   

The people were required to totally obey the Law strictly, for the Law was made steadfast, confirmed, or enforced by penalties for violating it.  The people were not allowed to violate it, or literally, overstep its bounds. There could be no disobedience to the Law. Reaction was always swift.  It was taken seriously, even though it represented a partial revelation. God would not be mocked. 

It is clear that there is a fixed point of safety beyond which we should not drift. No circumstance can be tolerated which will weaken our hold on the hope of salvation, for that would bring instant catastrophe.

 

Verse 3.   This word from Jesus is a greater word brought by a much greater person. He brings greater promises, but rejecting him would logically bring greater condemnation.  Simply neglecting it is impossible if one wanted any meaningful salvation.    

The punishment to neglect this infinitely greater offer from the infinitely greater person of Jesus, would be obviously much more dreadful than the punishment that fell on those who disobeyed that law, which was mediated by angels, a law which was steadfast. 

Note that the punishment God brings on sinners is really no more than what they deserve.  It is a just recompense.  

This gospel of Jesus is described as a great salvation, a salvation with which nothing can compare. It speaks of a great new covenant and brings rewards, which the human mind can hardly even understand.  To sin against this gospel means showing contempt for the grace of God in Christ, and counting his sacrifice as nothing. 

The misery of these people who neglected the gospel cannot be avoided.  They are condemned already, and await the justice of the great white throne judgment.  See John 3:18. None of these who reject or neglect this great salvation will escape the condemnation. 

Note that this is an appeal to reason and to the conscience of sinners. It is telling them to act in their own interest, and to seize the established and prepared way to escape the wrath and judgment of God, and to seek refuge in his mercy. If they do not they will be speechless on the Day of Judgment.   

The appeal is also made on the basis of the dignity and excellent of Jesus.  He first spoke this gospel, promising life and goodness.  It was plainly spoken when men sinned, and many types and shadows were used to explain what was to come. 

Those that heard him knew what was to come.  The prophets had spoken about him, and now those that had been with him, seen him, touched him, handled him, had testified that the one with life had come and lived among them. 

Verse 4.   There were many eyewitnesses, people of sterling character, who heard him and who bore witness to him.  The proclamation begun by Jesus himself had continued. 

Jesus had done many signs and wonders to attest to who he was.  The apostles had also done many miracles, for Jesus had given them miraculous powers. Any court of law would therefore accept this testimony of confirmation. 

The Holy Spirit had given the promised great gifts to the followers of Christ, and everyone could see that.                                   

 

CONCLUSION

WHAT KIND OF PEOPLE ARE WE TO REJECT OR EVEN NEGLECT THE NEW GOVERNMENT? 

DO WE REALLY UNDERSTAND WHO JESUS IS? OR DO WE HAVE DOUBTS ABOUT HIM, DOUBTS THAT WE DO NOT WANT TO ADMIT? 

IT REALLY MAKES NO SENSE DRIFTING FOR WE WOULD NEVER ESCAPE THE CONSEQUENT WRATH OF GOD AND THE JUDGMENT OF HELL. 

THERE IS NO OTHER OFFER ON THE TABLE. 

CARELESS INATTENTION TO THE GOSPEL AND TO CAREFUL PRACTICE OF THE COMMANDMENTS OF GOD IS NOT ADVISABLE. 

REMEMBER THAT THERE ARE PERSONALITIES OUT THERE THAT ARE POWERFUL, AND THAT ARE NOT SO NICE. THEY DESERVE RESPECT. KEEP AWAY FROM THEM. THEY CANNOT HELP YOU, FOR THEY THEMSELVES ARE SLATED FOR ETERNAL PUNISHMENT.  DO NOT PLAY WITH THEM. DO NOT GIVE THEM MORE ATTENTION THAN THEY DESERVE. 

FOCUS ON CHRIST. HE IS THE ONLY IMPORTANT ONE!

HE IS ON THE THRONE!                      .